Kissflow vs Joget Workflow which BPM Tool is Better
Date
Sep 30, 25
Reading Time
8 Minutes
Category
Low-Code/No-Code Development

Business process management is no longer a convenient choice; it’s the quiet backbone of efficiency. When teams start debating Joget vs Kissflow, the discussion usually goes beyond features and pricing.
It touches on culture, control, and the level of freedom you want in shaping workflows. Joget DX is an open-source, low-code platform designed for process automation and delivering enterprise applications.
The question is not simply which is cheaper or flashier, but which tool aligns with the way your organisation thinks and scales. In this comparison of Kissflow vs. Joget DX, we’ll unpack where each shines and where they stumble.
What is Kissflow?

Kissflow positions itself as a no-code/low-code platform for business process management with a strong “simplicity-first” philosophy.
Unlike Joget, which balances developer flexibility with business-user accessibility, Kissflow focuses on empowering non-technical users to design workflows, approvals, and simple apps directly from an intuitive interface.
It provides prebuilt templates for HR, procurement, and project management, meaning teams can get started without long configuration cycles. Kissflow is entirely cloud-based, which makes deployment painless but also places organisations firmly in its hosted ecosystem.
Its integrations cover Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and major CRMs, with APIs available for custom connections.
Pricing starts higher than Joget: Kissflow’s basic workflow plans begin at around $15 per user per month, with enterprise editions climbing significantly. The trade-off is convenience and speed over granular control.
Key Features
- Cloud-native no-code/low-code BPM platform.
- Ready-to-use templates for HR, finance, and procurement processes.
- Drag-and-drop workflow designer for non-technical users.
- Integrations with Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and popular CRMs.
- Flexible API access but limited on-premises options.
App Development Features Comparison: Joget vs Kissflow
Both Joget and Kissflow offer visual builders to design workflows and applications more quickly than traditional coding. They reduce manual steps, streamline approvals, and help business users participate directly in process design.
Joget emphasizes extensibility, blending no-code simplicity with the option to integrate with low-code or custom Java when needed.
Kissflow, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use, ready-to-use templates, and cloud-first deployment, making it more accessible for non-technical teams.
While both platforms target efficiency, their approaches diverge: Joget offers deeper control for IT-driven projects, whereas Kissflow accelerates rollouts for departments wanting speed with minimal oversight.
Key Differences: Joget vs Kissflow
Feature / Factor | Joget DX Highlights | Kissflow Highlights |
Deployment | Flexible on-premises and cloud-native with Docker/Kubernetes support | 100% cloud-based, SaaS model with managed infrastructure |
Generative AI | AI Designer, AI Agent Builder, and natural-language-assisted workflows | AI-assisted development and lifecycle automation |
Target Users | Citizen developers, IT teams, and organizations needing hybrid flexibility | Business users, HR, procurement, and project teams with minimal IT support |
Customization | Plugin-based extensions, Java support, and open-source adaptability | Template-driven, limited low-code depth beyond workflows |
Integration | REST/SOAP APIs, JDBC connectors, and open database support | Prebuilt connectors with Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and popular CRMs |
Pricing | Community edition free; Enterprise ~ $13/user/year (100 User Pack) | Starts at ~$15/user/month; enterprise plans scale higher |
Scalability | Manual cluster setup for large workloads; strong in hybrid IT contexts | Cloud-native scaling handled automatically by vendor |
Community & Support | Smaller but active open-source community, optional enterprise support | Larger SaaS customer base with formal support packages |
Best Fit | Teams needing flexibility, hybrid deployments, and developer extensibility | Organisations prioritising simplicity, rapid adoption, and cloud-only workflows |
Pros and Cons: Joget vs Kissflow
When comparing Joget vs Kissflow, both platforms show clear strengths and trade-offs. Joget excels in flexibility and cost control, while Kissflow distinguishes itself with simplicity and SaaS scalability.
Joget DX – Pros and Cons
Joget DX appeals to organisations that want freedom, hybrid deployment, and lower licensing costs. It’s powerful when IT teams and business users collaborate, although it can require more technical effort to unlock its full potential.
Pros | Cons / Trade-offs |
Open source / Community edition available: Lower entry barrier, free community edition with core features | Scaling & performance tuning require expertise: Large applications may need IT or DevOps input |
Deployment flexibility: Supports on-premises, cloud, or hybrid infrastructure | Smaller ecosystem/community relative to large SaaS platforms: Fewer community resources, less “brand mindshare” |
Strong extensibility & integration via plugins, APIs | Fewer out-of-box, certified enterprise connectors: Integration often requires customization |
Modern version features (DX 8 / DX 9): Includes App Templates, governance checks, AI tools, Git integration, better UX | Template / starter apps inventory is still limited compared to large low-code suites |
Rapid development via visual tools: Drag-and-drop, low code / no code for many scenarios | Feature gaps or workarounds for highly complex or niche needs: Some advanced scenarios require custom code or plugin development |
Kissflow – Pros and Cons
Kissflow thrives on ease of use. It is designed for non-technical teams that require ready-to-use workflows and cloud scalability. The trade-off is reduced depth and flexibility compared to Joget DX.
Pros | Cons |
Strong adoption among HR, procurement, and project teams | Pricing scales quickly for large enterprises (~$15/user/month upward) |
Drag-and-drop designer enables non-technical teams to build apps fast | Fully cloud-based, no on-premises deployment option |
Ready-to-use templates for HR, finance, and procurement processes | Limited customization depth compared to Joget DX |
SaaS infrastructure ensures automatic scaling and updates | Less suited for complex, IT-driven workflows |
Integrations with Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and major CRMs | Narrow AI and automation feature set |
A. Scalability and Performance
Scalability determines how well a BPM platform performs as processes multiply and user demands increase.
Factor | Joget DX | Kissflow |
Scaling | Manual cluster setup with Docker/Kubernetes | Automatic scaling handled by SaaS infrastructure |
Footprint | Strong for hybrid and on-prem workloads | Suited for cloud-native enterprise use cases |
Availability | Requires manual clustering and failover | Built-in failover and uptime SLAs |
Monitoring | Basic monitoring depends on the underlying infrastructure | Advanced tracking is included in the SaaS package |
B. Integration and Extensibility
Integration is often where platforms prove their long-term value.
Factor | Joget DX | Kissflow |
APIs & Connectors | REST/SOAP APIs, JDBC, open plugin flexibility | Prebuilt connectors for Google, Microsoft, Salesforce, Slack |
Extensibility | Open-source with Java plugin and custom code support | Limited extensibility beyond the provided templates and APIs |
Data Sources | Works with SQL/NoSQL, JDBC drivers | Integrates with major SaaS apps; limited database variety |
Microservices | Can invoke external endpoints through workflows | API-based triggers, but no microservice-first design |
C. Customization and Development Speed
Every organisation balances speed with depth.
Factor | Joget DX | Kissflow |
APIs & Connectors | REST/SOAP APIs, JDBC, open plugin flexibility | Prebuilt connectors for Google, Microsoft, Salesforce, Slack |
Extensibility | Open-source with Java plugin and custom code support | Limited extensibility beyond the provided templates and APIs |
Data Sources | Works with SQL/NoSQL, JDBC drivers | Integrates with major SaaS apps; limited database variety |
Microservices | Can invoke external endpoints through workflows | API-based triggers, but no microservice-first design |
Suggested Reading: Oracle vs Joget: Which Low-Code Platform Fits Your Needs?
D. Security and Compliance
Security is often the deciding factor in selecting a BPM solution.
Factor | Joget DX | Kissflow |
Certifications | ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR support | SOC 2, GDPR, ISO; stronger SaaS compliance |
Access Control | Role-based access, audit logs, encryption | Advanced identity, SSO, OAuth, MFA |
Deployment Security | Supports on-prem or cloud with encryption | Cloud-native with vendor-managed security |
DevOps Security | Basic testing and manual audits | Automated pipelines, vendor vulnerability testing |
E. Support and Community
Long-term adoption depends as much on community and support as on features.
Factor | Joget DX | Kissflow |
Community | Smaller but active open-source forums | Larger SaaS customer ecosystem |
Documentation | Developer-focused, with plugins and API guides | Extensive guides for business users and admins |
Vendor Support | Professional support contracts are optional | Formal 24/7 enterprise support packages |
Training | Limited formal programs rely on the community | In-app tutorials, SaaS onboarding, and workshops |
Use Cases: Joget vs Kissflow
Both platforms are utilized across various industries to modernize workflows, enhance productivity, and minimize reliance on manual processes.
Joget DX often finds its strength in hybrid enterprise environments where IT and business teams collaborate, while Kissflow thrives in departmental settings where speed and accessibility are the top priorities.
A. Relinns Insurance Policy Management — Joget DX Use Case
Problem: An insurance company faced constant delays in policy issuance and claims handling. Processes were fragmented across underwriting, finance, and agent teams, leading to duplicated data, frequent errors, and slow customer response times. Renewals were often missed, resulting in poor compliance and customer satisfaction.
Solution: Relinns deployed a Joget DX–based policy management platform. The system introduced reusable policy templates, automated approval workflows, SLA tracking, integrated payments, and role-based dashboards. APIs enabled connection with external CRMs and brokers, while automated document generation reduced repetitive manual tasks.
Results
- Achieved 40% reduction in manual errors through automated validation.
- Cut claims approval time from days to under 24 hours with SLA-based routing.
- Raised renewal compliance rates to nearly 90% across policy types.
- Reduced support queries by ~70% with self-service dashboards.
- Improved the accuracy of policy documents to ~92%, strengthening customer trust.
Read more here: Relinns Insurance Policy Management Case Study
B. JourneyOne Contract Renewal Automation — Kissflow Use Case
Problem: JourneyOne struggled with contract renewals managed through emails and scattered reminders. Contracts were frequently missed, approvals were delayed, and stakeholders lacked visibility into renewal timelines. The process resulted in wasted time, confusion over versions, and a decline in customer confidence.
Solution: Using Kissflow, JourneyOne implemented a structured workflow for contract renewals. Automated reminders, centralised approvals, and role-based dashboards replaced manual processes. The workflow gave managers visibility into every stage, reduced back-and-forth communication, and ensured that renewal timelines were consistently met.
Results
- Improved on-time renewals, sharply reducing missed deadlines.
- Gained unified visibility over contracts, eliminating version conflicts and lost data.
- Increased operational efficiency by cutting unnecessary manual follow-ups.
- Accelerated approval cycles through centralised workflow management.
- Boosted overall customer satisfaction with more reliable contract handling.
Read more here: JourneyOne Contract Renewal Automation Case Study
Pricing Comparison: Joget vs Kissflow
Both platforms provide free entry points and enterprise licensing, but their models differ sharply.
Joget DX keeps costs low with an open-source Community edition and affordable enterprise tiers, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious teams.
Kissflow, by contrast, follows a SaaS subscription model, starting at a higher per-user monthly rate that can climb quickly as usage scales across departments.
Plan / Tier | Joget DX (Annual) | Kissflow (Monthly) |
Free | Community Edition (GPL, free) | Basic Starter Plan (free trial available) |
Standard / Basic | Enterprise: from ~$5/user/year (25-user packs) | Workflow plan from ~$15/user/month |
Enterprise | Custom enterprise pricing with on-prem and hybrid support | Enterprise plan (quote required, priced per user at scale) |
Which Tool is Best for Your Organisation?
The choice between Joget vs Kissflow depends less on features and more on priorities.
For organisations with limited budgets, hybrid infrastructure needs, or a desire for open-source flexibility, Joget DX is a strong fit. Its licensing makes it cost-effective, and its plugin architecture offers deeper control for IT-led projects.
Kissflow, on the other hand, is best suited for business teams that want to automate quickly without leaning on IT.
Its cloud-only model removes infrastructure headaches, while prebuilt templates accelerate rollouts in HR, procurement, and project management. The trade-off is less room for heavy customisation.
Final Thoughts on Joget vs Kissflow
When evaluating Joget vs Kissflow, the decision often comes down to scale, budget, and governance needs.
Joget DX stands out as a cost-effective, open-source solution for organisations that want flexibility and hybrid deployment options.
Its strengths lie in giving IT teams control while still offering business users visual tools for workflow automation.
Kissflow, by contrast, is designed for speed and ease of use.
Its SaaS-first approach, ready-to-use templates, and automatic scaling make it ideal for non-technical departments. However, these advantages come with higher per-user costs and less depth in complex, enterprise-grade customisation.
Both platforms deliver strong BPM capabilities, but they cater to different mindsets. Joget resonates with teams that want to build and customise extensively, while Kissflow resonates with those that want to launch quickly and manage everything in the cloud.
Aligning the tool with your organisation’s culture and digital roadmap is the surest way to get long-term value.
Why Choose Relinns for Joget?
- Approximately 90% of workflows can be automated without coding, significantly accelerating delivery.
- App deployment is up to 40% faster compared with other BPM competitors.
- Workflow errors are reduced by as much as 75% through the use of visual rule engines.
- Compatible with 95% of enterprise collaboration and productivity tools.
- Workflow updates roll out 60% quicker with Relinns’ agile Joget expertise.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's)
Can Joget and Kissflow integrate with legacy ERP systems?
Yes. Joget connects via REST/SOAP APIs and JDBC, while Kissflow offers prebuilt connectors for CRMs, finance, and HR systems, ensuring smooth ERP integration.
Does Joget vs Kissflow support hybrid cloud environments?
Joget enables on-premises, hybrid, and cloud-native deployment with Kubernetes. Kissflow is SaaS-only but supports multi-cloud scaling and vendor-managed infrastructure.
How does the visual workflow builder differ between Joget and Kissflow?
Joget offers a no-code builder with low-code extensibility for IT teams. Kissflow offers a pure no-code interface designed for business users and departmental workflows.
Which industries benefit most from Joget vs Kissflow?
Joget is ideal for enterprises with hybrid IT infrastructures, such as those in the insurance, finance, and government sectors. Kissflow is widely adopted in HR, procurement, and project-heavy industries.
Can apps be migrated when switching from Joget to Kissflow?
Direct migration is complex, as each has its unique models. However, APIs and connectors allow interoperability, enabling the reuse of data models and workflows.